CO129-190 - Governor Hennessy - 1880 [10-12] — Page 431

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

419-

all respects like our Jurisdiction

and

as when sitting in Court, the Ordinance (5 of 1864)

contains

such provisions.

I think therefore that under the Ordinance (5 of 1864) there is neither power to provide by general order

for sittings

at Chambers,

2 x Y

to apply rules of the Act 1861

authorize such sittings.

Recourse

to power

to

the general orders

under the Act (1861) is not intended

to supercede the necessity for

rules

under the Ordinance (5 of 1864). Nor does the proviso that permits such

warrant the general application

of any general order under the Act

(1861) to the procedure

here. Such Orders

of

the

Court

should be properly

applied only to cases

as they arise and

a

matter for the

discretion of

the Judge

exercised with

care, with reference to each such

application.

Even

supposing therefore that there

were

power to provide for sittings

in Chambers,

and it

were desired to

make such provision

to regulate practice

in some way

corresponding to rule 17 under the Act 1861,

the proper way

to make that provision

would have been

under section 7 of the Ordinance (5 of 1864)

to frame such a rule.

The judge states that he is

informed that the practice of sittings

in

...

Edit History

2026-05-22 02:33:40 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
419- all respects like our Jurisdiction and as when sitting in Court, the Ordinance (5 of 1864) contains such provisions. I think therefore that under the Ordinance (5 of 1864) there is neither power to provide by general order for sittings at Chambers, 2 x Y to apply rules of the Act 1861 authorize such sittings. Recourse to power to the general orders under the Act (1861) is not intended to supercede the necessity for rules under the Ordinance (5 of 1864). Nor does the proviso that permits such warrant the general application of any general order under the Act (1861) to the procedure here. Such Orders of the Court should be properly applied only to cases as they arise and a matter for the discretion of the Judge exercised with care, with reference to each such application. Even supposing therefore that there were power to provide for sittings in Chambers, and it were desired to make such provision to regulate practice in some way corresponding to rule 17 under the Act 1861, the proper way to make that provision would have been under section 7 of the Ordinance (5 of 1864) to frame such a rule. The judge states that he is informed that the practice of sittings in ...
Baseline (Original)
419- all respects like pour Jurisdiction and as when sitting in Const, the Ordinance (5 of 1864) Contains such provisions. I think therefore that under the Ordinance (5 of 18644) there is neither powder to provide by general order for villings at Chambers, 2 x Y to apply role of of the act 1861 authorize such sittings. Recourse · pover to to the general orders under the Act (1861) is not intended. to supercede the necessity for rules under the Ordinance (5 of 18611) does the proviso that permits such warrant the general application recourse of any general order under the ( 1861) to the procedure here. Such Orders of 428 the Court be properly a 3 they arise and A matter for the applied only to cases the application is discretion of the Judge reference. to each such exercised with Cade. Even extre supposing therefore that there to provide for sittings and power Chambers. and it were desired to to regulate practice 4' rule corresponding in some way make such provision to the rule 17f under the Act 1861 framed. under would have beere - 7 of the Ordinance (5 of 1864) the proper way. make that provision. to The judge states that he is that the practise of sittings act informed in Vec
2026-05-22 02:33:40 · Baseline
View content

419-

all respects like pour Jurisdiction

and

as when sitting in Const, the Ordinance (5 of 1864)

Contains

such provisions.

I think therefore that under the Ordinance (5 of 18644) there is neither powder to provide by general order

for villings

at Chambers,

2 x Y

to apply role of of the act 1861

authorize such sittings.

Recourse

· pover

to

to the general orders

under the Act (1861) is not intended.

to supercede the necessity for

rules

under the Ordinance (5 of 18611) does the proviso that permits such

warrant the general application

recourse

of any general order under the

( 1861) to the procedure

here. Such Orders

of

428

the

Court

be properly

a 3

they arise and

A

matter for the

applied only to cases the application is

discretion of

the Judge

reference. to each such

exercised with

Cade.

Even

extre

supposing therefore that there

to provide for sittings

and power

Chambers.

and it

were

desired to

to regulate practice

4'

rule corresponding in some

way

make such provision

to the rule 17f under the Act 1861 framed.

under

would have beere

- 7 of the Ordinance (5 of 1864)

the proper way.

make

that provision.

to

The judge states that he is

that the practise of sittings

act

informed

in

Vec

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.